The New Zealand election outcome has left people wondering what went wrong for the ruling Labour Party and the legacy of Jacinda Ardern. Initially, Ardern’s warm smile and genuine rhetoric brought a new freshness to New Zealand politics, making her popular with the public. She became a global figure and a role model for many. However, as time went on, people began to assess her based on practical outcomes and delivery rather than just her oratory skills. This was where the fault line was exposed, with New Zealanders feeling let down by a multitude of policy failures and undelivered promises under Ardern’s leadership.
Ardern’s charm offensive seemed to be reserved for those who agreed with her politics, leading to accusations of partisanship. As the economy worsened and her legacy of non-performance became evident, Ardern left the scene, leaving her successor, Chris Hipkins, to deal with the mess. The shortfall in social housing and the delayed light rail project were just some of the issues that contributed to public dissatisfaction. The co-governance agenda with Māoris and proposed “hate” speech legislation also fueled resentment among voters who wanted a government focused on practical issues.
The New Zealand election outcome serves as a lesson for Australian Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and reinforces his approach to public policy. It also coincided with the rejection of the Voice proposal to alter the Australian Constitution, showing a common trans-Tasman experience. Superficiality and expressed empathy alone are not enough for a government to succeed; it requires a constant energy source and a focus on practical solutions. This realization was the downfall of Labour and serves as a warning for future political leaders.