The global climate crisis is reaching a critical point, and it is essential that we take any necessary measures to address it. However, it seems that Liberal parliamentary seats in Atlantic Canada are exempt from these urgent actions. Recently, it was announced that the federal carbon tax on home heating oil will be suspended for three years, implying that the man-made climate crisis may not be as serious as initially believed or that the government’s policies may not be effective. This decision is likely influenced by the grim polling numbers faced by the Liberal party, prioritizing political considerations over the burning environmental issues at hand.
The prime minister’s actions have often failed to align with his words, leading many to question his sincerity. The decision to remove the tax on home heating oil in Atlantic provinces while keeping it on natural gas further raises doubts. The prime minister did not shy away from acknowledging the regional calculations behind this move, stating that adjustments were necessary to make the pollution price work for everyone. Nevertheless, he emphasized that the fight against climate change will continue, even though his actions indicate a different priority.
The possibility of cynicism on the prime minister’s part cannot be dismissed entirely, as politicians are often accused of deception. However, assuming that Trudeau secretly agrees with opposing viewpoints and is merely feigning concern for political gain is not a convincing argument. Instead, it may be worth considering the idea that politicians present shallow justifications because they lack substantial alternatives. Trudeau may genuinely believe that he is striking the right balance between aggressive climate action and maintaining public support.
Although it is frustrating to witness rising emissions and declining poll numbers, significant change cannot be expected overnight. The Liberal Atlantic Caucus chair expressed that their program aims to help people immediately while also providing long-term transition programs. To achieve these goals and remain in power, the Liberals may have to make adjustments along the way. They claim to listen to the people and be focused on their objectives, adopting a flexible approach to accommodate competing priorities.
There is an argument for choosing governance by rogues rather than fools, as rogues can be cunning and adaptable in times of crisis. However, the current political landscape often feels more like being nibbled to death by ducks. Trudeau’s unwavering belief in the existential threat of man-made climate change and his conviction that his policies will save us from ourselves may seem absurd to some. Nevertheless, absurdity also exists in Canada’s lack of functioning armed forces, excessive bureaucracy, indulgence in censorship, and other questionable decisions made by the government.
When I say that Canada is not a serious nation, I do not mean to downplay the seriousness of the situation. Neglecting security or prioritizing trivial matters can lead to disastrous consequences, just as intentional betrayal can. The Liberal party’s climate policies have had adverse effects on the economy and national unity, while their approach to politics has contributed to its toxicity. However, if our government fails to take the necessary actions, it is up to us to elect politicians who are serious about addressing these issues without ulterior motives. Otherwise, sacrifices will be demanded from all except the vulnerable Liberal MPs and their jet-setting leader.