The independent immigration watchdog has criticized the Home Office for redacting over 100 pieces of information from a report on the risks of corrupt Border Force staff. The chief inspector of borders and immigration, David Neal, stated that the removal of material fails to meet the “high reasons of national security threshold.” Among the sections removed was a recommendation by Mr. Neal, who described the current state of the force as a “breeding ground” for corruption. The watchdog has called on the Home Office to reconsider the decision to omit information for the sake of transparency and independent scrutiny.
The inspection report highlighted concerns over insider threats within Border Force, warning that if not addressed, it could lead to a “damaging fallout” similar to that faced by the Metropolitan Police. While most staff were found to uphold honesty and integrity, the report emphasized that privileged access to data, property, and contraband poses a risk of abuse by a corrupt minority. The report also criticized the leadership structures for addressing insider threats, citing confusion, complex relationships, and unclear lines of accountability.
The report identified the limitations faced by Border Force in accessing data to identify and reduce risks, stating that no one has a complete picture of the insider threat risk within the organization. The Home Office has partially accepted two of the report’s recommendations and fully accepted six others, indicating a recognition of the need for improvements in processes, data sharing, and training.
Chief Inspector Neal raised concerns about the redactions made by the Home Office and questioned the oversight of such decisions. While acknowledging the need to protect national security and individual safety, he emphasized the importance of oversight and independent scrutiny. The delays in publishing the report and the extensive redactions have undermined the report’s impact and raised legitimate concerns. The report called for a stronger culture and clear identity within Border Force to address the dissatisfied workforce and reduce the risk of insider threats. The Home Office responded by acknowledging the need for further action and access to data to inform their approach.