The founder of the charity Endometriosis South Coast has stirred up controversy by suggesting that endometriosis is not solely a gynaecological issue, especially given the recent appointment of Steph Richards, a male-born trans activist, as its chief executive. Jodie Hughes, speaking on BBC “Woman’s Hour,” challenged the characterization of endometriosis as a “gynaecological disorder” and suggested that this label may be impeding further medical research into the condition. While both the Royal College of Nursing and Endometriosis UK refer to the condition as “the second most common gynaecological condition in the UK,” Ms. Hughes argued that it is a systemic inflammatory condition, not exclusive to gynaecology. She advocated for a broader perspective on the condition, emphasizing that “you don’t have to be born with a womb to have it.”
Endometriosis South Coast made headlines with the controversial appointment of 71-year-old trans-rights activist Ms. Richards as its chief executive. The announcement on social media, along with a quote from Ms. Richards about medical professionals addressing endometriosis, triggered backlash. The charity defended its decision, asserting that Ms. Richards’ advocacy for those in the endo community is what prompted her appointment, not her personal health journey.
Journalist Mary Harrington commented that those challenging the use of sexed language in medical issues are engaging in class signalling. This could limit access to healthcare for less-educated women, neurodiverse women, non-native English speakers, and others who may not have the privileged viewpoint that sex dimorphism is politically meaningless or nonexistent.
Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at Sex Matters, expressed concerns about Ms. Hughes’ comments, stating that it is “absurd and offensive” to suggest that endometriosis is not a women’s reproductive issue. She urged the medical profession to do more for women and to avoid rebranding women’s diseases by pretending they affect men.
In conclusion, there is heated debate surrounding the characterization of endometriosis and the recent appointment in the charity leadership. The controversy extends beyond a particular individual’s belief and speaks to broader issues of healthcare, gender, and access for those affected by endometriosis.