In November, the Federal Court of Canada ruled that Ottawa’s classification of manufactured plastic items as ‘toxic‘ was deemed ‘unreasonable and unconstitutional.’ Subsequently, Ottawa announced plans for a national registry, which aims to require companies to track and report their plastic production in order to achieve the goal of having zero plastic waste by 2030.
The federal government is seeking input from local governments, companies, stakeholders, and the public to shape the federal plastics registry. Public consultations launched to gather feedback through email or letter, with the deadline set for February 13. Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault stated that the registry is a crucial tool to help manage and monitor plastics across the economy, and it will hold companies accountable by requiring them to report their plastic usage and management annually.
The idea behind the proposed national registry is to improve on the existing programs of provinces and territories by collecting and reporting data on a wide range of plastic products, including single-use and disposable items, packaging, home appliances, electronics, construction, transportation, textiles, and more. However, not all provinces are on board with Canada’s plan, with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith openly critical of the plastic ban, which she believes will have a negative impact on the petrochemical industry and jobs. She also expressed opposition to the proposed registry.
Ottawa’s plan to control plastic waste in Canada has faced legal challenges, including the court ruling that the classification of manufactured plastic items as toxic was unreasonable and unconstitutional. The Federal Court of Canada stated that the order exceeded Ottawa’s ability to make criminal law. Mr. Guilbeault announced that the government would appeal the ruling, while Ms. Smith vowed to intervene in the appeal to defend her province’s constitutional jurisdiction and economy. The policy was also under evaluation by the courts, with Alberta and Saskatchewan joining a case brought forward by the Responsible Plastic Users Coalition. Despite these legal challenges, Mr. Guilbeault emphasized that the government is acting in response to the Canadian public’s demand for action to tackle plastic waste. He stressed the scientific evidence showing the impacts of plastic pollution on human health and the environment, and the desire to address the problem according to the will of Canadians.