Australia’s response to a request for a naval vessel to be sent to the Red Sea revealed the deficiencies in the country’s defense capabilities. Years of indecision and neglect by previous governments have left Australia vulnerable. In particular, budget cuts, delays in acquiring new naval fleets, and ongoing issues with submarine procurement have created uncertainty. While the Abbott Liberal government increased defense spending to a minimum of 2 percent of GDP, subsequent delays and challenges have continued to impact Australia’s security.
Despite the recent AUKUS agreement and plans to lease or purchase United States nuclear-powered vessels, there are doubts about the U.S.’s ability to supply new submarines to Australia. The inadequate response to the Red Sea request has drawn attention to the seriousness of these security issues.
The Red Sea is a crucial trade route, with a significant percentage of global trade passing through it. Despite this, Australia’s response to the request for naval assistance was underwhelming, with only 16 personnel dispatched to Bahrain. This raised concerns about the adequacy of Australia’s defense force and the country’s ability to protect its interests.
Australia’s coastline stretches over 25,000 kilometers, yet there are only 50 commissioned naval vessels to protect it. Additionally, many of these vessels are not operational at any given time. The statement by Defence Minister Richard Marles highlights the limited defense capabilities of the nation.
The events in the Middle East and other regions underscore the need for a serious conversation about Australia’s defense and security. Additionally, the aggressive actions of the Chinese Communist Party in the China Seas pose a real threat to Australia’s security.
It is essential for the Australian government to address these security challenges and prioritize measures to improve the nation’s security. The defense of the nation is a fundamental responsibility and should be a priority for the government.